ResiMob: Difference between revisions

From Dreams Knowledge Platform
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== What ResiMob does ==
<div class="sump-intro">
'''ResiMob''' is a survey and visualisation tool that shows a group of stakeholders their shared picture of who does what in a shared mobility system, and where that picture is not shared at all. It was developed in the DREAMS work on governance and business models and has been run with the partners of all six [[Living Lab Overview|living labs]].


ResiMob is a survey and visualisation tool developed in DREAMS work package 4 on
A session takes a group of partners around a quarter of an hour. Each person rates how involved companies, authorities, users, non-users and civil society are today and how involved they ought to be, and the answers come back as one radar chart the group can read and argue over together.
governance and business models. It helps a group of stakeholders see their collective
picture of who does what in a shared mobility system, and where that picture is not shared.


Public and private actors working on the same shared mobility service rarely describe it
<div class="dreams-btn">[[#The survey|Take the survey →]]</div>
the same way. An operator, a municipal department, a user group and a neighbourhood
</div>
organisation each see a different part of the system, and each holds a different view of who
ought to be taking responsibility for which part of it. Those views are usually held
implicitly and only surface once a decision has to be made. ResiMob asks for them directly
and puts them side by side.


== What respondents rate ==
== What the tool asks ==


Respondents work through nine components that together make up a resilient, inclusive and
Public and private actors working on the same shared mobility service rarely describe it the same way. An operator, a municipal department, a user group and a neighbourhood organisation each see a different part of the system, and each holds a different view of who ought to be taking responsibility for which part of it. Those views usually stay implicit and only surface once a decision has to be made. ResiMob asks for them directly and puts them side by side.
responsible shared mobility ecosystem. For each component they rate how involved a specific actor should ideally be.


The five actor types are private companies, governmental and municipal institutions, shared
Respondents work through nine components that together make up a resilient, inclusive and responsible shared mobility ecosystem. For each component they rate five actor types, namely private companies, governmental and municipal institutions, shared mobility users, citizens who do not use the services, and NGOs and third sector organisations. Involvement runs from one, very low, to five, very high, with zero available where the respondent cannot judge.
mobility users, citizens who are not users, and NGOs and third sector organisations.
Involvement runs from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high), with 0 available where the respondent
cannot judge.


Wished involvement means the level of participation the respondent considers ideal for making
== Two ratings for every actor ==
shared mobility accessible in suburban and peripheral areas and for moving towards 15-minute
 
neighbourhoods. It is a normative judgement rather than a forecast, which is what makes the
Each actor is rated twice on every component, and the value of the tool lies in the difference between the two.
comparison with present involvement worth reading.
 
<div class="sump-bodies-grid">
<div class="sump-body-card">
<div class="sump-body-card__label">Current involvement</div>
<div class="sump-body-card__desc">How involved the respondent sees each actor in the local shared mobility system today. It records the arrangement as it is actually experienced, which is not always the one written into contracts and strategies.</div>
</div>
<div class="sump-body-card">
<div class="sump-body-card__label">Wished involvement</div>
<div class="sump-body-card__desc">How involved each actor should ideally be to make shared mobility accessible in suburban and peripheral areas and to move towards 15-minute neighbourhoods. It is a normative judgement rather than a forecast.</div>
</div>
</div>


== How to read the results ==
== How to read the results ==


Responses are pooled and drawn as a radar chart, and the results view can be filtered by city
Responses are pooled and drawn as a radar chart, and the results view can be filtered by city or region, by respondent type and by the actor being rated. Two readings matter.
or region, by respondent type and by actor type. Two readings matter.


The first is the distance between the present shape and the wished shape for a given actor. A
The first is the distance between the current shape and the wished shape for a given actor. A wide gap marks a role the group thinks is underfilled today. A narrow gap marks an arrangement that is broadly accepted as it stands.
wide gap marks a role the group thinks is currently underfilled. A narrow gap marks an
arrangement that is broadly accepted as it stands.


The second is the spread between respondent groups on the same component. Where operators,
The second is the spread between respondent groups on the same component. Where operators, authorities and civil society draw the same shape, there is a working consensus to build on. Where they diverge, there is an assumption about responsibility that has not yet been tested in conversation.
authorities and civil society draw the same shape, there is a working consensus to build on.
Where they diverge, there is an assumption about responsibility that has not yet been tested
in conversation.


ResiMob does not settle who should be responsible for what. It makes the disagreement visible
<div class="dreams-callout">
and specific enough to be discussed, which is what a governance conversation needs before
<div class="dreams-callout__label">A starting point, not a verdict</div>
roles and responsibilities can be agreed.
ResiMob does not settle who should be responsible for what. It makes the disagreement visible and specific enough to be discussed, which is what a governance conversation needs before roles can be agreed. That is why it is most useful while [[Agree actions and responsibilities|actions and responsibilities]] are still a draft and each allocation can still change.
</div>
<br>
== Taking the survey ==


To see how the Radarcharts can look like you can check out the [{{fullurl:Special:Radarchart|file=File:ResimobSurvey.csv}} Results of ResiMob Survey conducted in all Living Labs].
A session can run in one room or be spread across the partners, and the results end up in the same combined chart either way.


== Taking the survey ==
<div class="dreams-tutorial">
<div class="dreams-tutorial__step">
<div class="dreams-tutorial__title">Choose how to collect the answers</div>
<div class="dreams-tutorial__body">In a workshop, sit together at one device and fill in the form below person by person. If the partners cannot meet, send them the link to this page so each can answer on their own. Either way, name one person as host to gather and combine the results.</div>
</div>
<div class="dreams-tutorial__step">
<div class="dreams-tutorial__title">Fill in the survey</div>
<div class="dreams-tutorial__body">Each respondent works through the nine components and rates the current and wished involvement of every actor type. It takes around ten to fifteen minutes per person.</div>
</div>
<div class="dreams-tutorial__step">
<div class="dreams-tutorial__title">Download the responses</div>
<div class="dreams-tutorial__body">When the form is complete, select '''Download the response(s) as CSV''' and send the file to the host. In a shared-device session one download holds everyone who answered on that device.</div>
</div>
<div class="dreams-tutorial__step">
<div class="dreams-tutorial__title">Merge and present</div>
<div class="dreams-tutorial__body">The host opens this page, selects '''Merge many responses''' and imports all the files received. The combined radar chart is then ready to show to the group, filtered by respondent type or by actor, as the basis for the discussion.</div>
</div>
</div>


The survey below takes around 10 to 15 minutes to complete. Sit together on one device and fill out the form below, person by person, or send out the link to this page to fill out the questionnaire individually, then click "Download the response(s) as CSV" and send the file to the workshop host. The host can then import and merge all results using the option "Merge many responses" on this page to then present the combined results!
<div class="dreams-handoff">
<div class="dreams-handoff__label">ResiMob results</div>
[{{fullurl:Special:Radarchart|file=File:ResimobSurvey.csv}} View the pooled results →] from the surveys run in all six DREAMS living labs, to see how the radar charts look before you run a session of your own.
</div>


== The survey ==
<br>
<resimobform></resimobform>
<resimobform></resimobform>

Revision as of 11:51, 21 September 2026

ResiMob is a survey and visualisation tool that shows a group of stakeholders their shared picture of who does what in a shared mobility system, and where that picture is not shared at all. It was developed in the DREAMS work on governance and business models and has been run with the partners of all six living labs.

A session takes a group of partners around a quarter of an hour. Each person rates how involved companies, authorities, users, non-users and civil society are today and how involved they ought to be, and the answers come back as one radar chart the group can read and argue over together.

What the tool asks

Public and private actors working on the same shared mobility service rarely describe it the same way. An operator, a municipal department, a user group and a neighbourhood organisation each see a different part of the system, and each holds a different view of who ought to be taking responsibility for which part of it. Those views usually stay implicit and only surface once a decision has to be made. ResiMob asks for them directly and puts them side by side.

Respondents work through nine components that together make up a resilient, inclusive and responsible shared mobility ecosystem. For each component they rate five actor types, namely private companies, governmental and municipal institutions, shared mobility users, citizens who do not use the services, and NGOs and third sector organisations. Involvement runs from one, very low, to five, very high, with zero available where the respondent cannot judge.

Two ratings for every actor

Each actor is rated twice on every component, and the value of the tool lies in the difference between the two.

Current involvement
How involved the respondent sees each actor in the local shared mobility system today. It records the arrangement as it is actually experienced, which is not always the one written into contracts and strategies.
Wished involvement
How involved each actor should ideally be to make shared mobility accessible in suburban and peripheral areas and to move towards 15-minute neighbourhoods. It is a normative judgement rather than a forecast.

How to read the results

Responses are pooled and drawn as a radar chart, and the results view can be filtered by city or region, by respondent type and by the actor being rated. Two readings matter.

The first is the distance between the current shape and the wished shape for a given actor. A wide gap marks a role the group thinks is underfilled today. A narrow gap marks an arrangement that is broadly accepted as it stands.

The second is the spread between respondent groups on the same component. Where operators, authorities and civil society draw the same shape, there is a working consensus to build on. Where they diverge, there is an assumption about responsibility that has not yet been tested in conversation.

A starting point, not a verdict

ResiMob does not settle who should be responsible for what. It makes the disagreement visible and specific enough to be discussed, which is what a governance conversation needs before roles can be agreed. That is why it is most useful while actions and responsibilities are still a draft and each allocation can still change.


Taking the survey

A session can run in one room or be spread across the partners, and the results end up in the same combined chart either way.

Choose how to collect the answers
In a workshop, sit together at one device and fill in the form below person by person. If the partners cannot meet, send them the link to this page so each can answer on their own. Either way, name one person as host to gather and combine the results.
Fill in the survey
Each respondent works through the nine components and rates the current and wished involvement of every actor type. It takes around ten to fifteen minutes per person.
Download the responses
When the form is complete, select Download the response(s) as CSV and send the file to the host. In a shared-device session one download holds everyone who answered on that device.
Merge and present
The host opens this page, selects Merge many responses and imports all the files received. The combined radar chart is then ready to show to the group, filtered by respondent type or by actor, as the basis for the discussion.
ResiMob results

View the pooled results → from the surveys run in all six DREAMS living labs, to see how the radar charts look before you run a session of your own.

The survey