ResiMob: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | <div class="sump-intro"> | ||
'''ResiMob''' is a survey and visualisation tool that shows a group of stakeholders their shared picture of who does what in a shared mobility system, and where that picture is not shared at all. It was developed in the DREAMS work on governance and business models and has been run with the partners of all six [[Living Lab Overview|living labs]]. | |||
A session takes a group of partners around a quarter of an hour. Each person rates how involved companies, authorities, users, non-users and civil society are today and how involved they ought to be, and the answers come back as one radar chart the group can read and argue over together. | |||
<div class="dreams-btn">[[#The survey|Take the survey →]]</div> | |||
</div> | |||
== What | == What the tool asks == | ||
Public and private actors working on the same shared mobility service rarely describe it the same way. An operator, a municipal department, a user group and a neighbourhood organisation each see a different part of the system, and each holds a different view of who ought to be taking responsibility for which part of it. Those views usually stay implicit and only surface once a decision has to be made. ResiMob asks for them directly and puts them side by side. | |||
Respondents work through nine components that together make up a resilient, inclusive and responsible shared mobility ecosystem. For each component they rate five actor types, namely private companies, governmental and municipal institutions, shared mobility users, citizens who do not use the services, and NGOs and third sector organisations. Involvement runs from one, very low, to five, very high, with zero available where the respondent cannot judge. | |||
mobility users, citizens who | |||
Involvement runs from | |||
cannot judge. | |||
== Two ratings for every actor == | |||
shared mobility accessible in suburban and peripheral areas and | |||
neighbourhoods. It is a normative judgement rather than a forecast | Each actor is rated twice on every component, and the value of the tool lies in the difference between the two. | ||
<div class="sump-bodies-grid"> | |||
<div class="sump-body-card"> | |||
<div class="sump-body-card__label">Current involvement</div> | |||
<div class="sump-body-card__desc">How involved the respondent sees each actor in the local shared mobility system today. It records the arrangement as it is actually experienced, which is not always the one written into contracts and strategies.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="sump-body-card"> | |||
<div class="sump-body-card__label">Wished involvement</div> | |||
<div class="sump-body-card__desc">How involved each actor should ideally be to make shared mobility accessible in suburban and peripheral areas and to move towards 15-minute neighbourhoods. It is a normative judgement rather than a forecast.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
== How to read the results == | == How to read the results == | ||
Responses are pooled and drawn as a radar chart, and the results view can be filtered by city | Responses are pooled and drawn as a radar chart, and the results view can be filtered by city or region, by respondent type and by the actor being rated. Two readings matter. | ||
or region, by respondent type and by actor | |||
The first is the distance between the | The first is the distance between the current shape and the wished shape for a given actor. A wide gap marks a role the group thinks is underfilled today. A narrow gap marks an arrangement that is broadly accepted as it stands. | ||
wide gap marks a role the group thinks is | |||
arrangement that is broadly accepted as it stands. | |||
The second is the spread between respondent groups on the same component. Where operators, | The second is the spread between respondent groups on the same component. Where operators, authorities and civil society draw the same shape, there is a working consensus to build on. Where they diverge, there is an assumption about responsibility that has not yet been tested in conversation. | ||
authorities and civil society draw the same shape, there is a working consensus to build on. | |||
Where they diverge, there is an assumption about responsibility that has not yet been tested | |||
in conversation. | |||
ResiMob does not settle who should be responsible for what. It makes the disagreement visible | <div class="dreams-callout"> | ||
and specific enough to be discussed, which is what a governance conversation needs before | <div class="dreams-callout__label">A starting point, not a verdict</div> | ||
roles and responsibilities can | ResiMob does not settle who should be responsible for what. It makes the disagreement visible and specific enough to be discussed, which is what a governance conversation needs before roles can be agreed. That is why it is most useful while [[Agree actions and responsibilities|actions and responsibilities]] are still a draft and each allocation can still change. | ||
</div> | |||
<br> | |||
== Taking the survey == | |||
A session can run in one room or be spread across the partners, and the results end up in the same combined chart either way. | |||
== | <div class="dreams-tutorial"> | ||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__step"> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__title">Choose how to collect the answers</div> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__body">In a workshop, sit together at one device and fill in the form below person by person. If the partners cannot meet, send them the link to this page so each can answer on their own. Either way, name one person as host to gather and combine the results.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__step"> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__title">Fill in the survey</div> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__body">Each respondent works through the nine components and rates the current and wished involvement of every actor type. It takes around ten to fifteen minutes per person.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__step"> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__title">Download the responses</div> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__body">When the form is complete, select '''Download the response(s) as CSV''' and send the file to the host. In a shared-device session one download holds everyone who answered on that device.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__step"> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__title">Merge and present</div> | |||
<div class="dreams-tutorial__body">The host opens this page, selects '''Merge many responses''' and imports all the files received. The combined radar chart is then ready to show to the group, filtered by respondent type or by actor, as the basis for the discussion.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="dreams-handoff"> | |||
<div class="dreams-handoff__label">ResiMob results</div> | |||
[{{fullurl:Special:Radarchart|file=File:ResimobSurvey.csv}} View the pooled results →] from the surveys run in all six DREAMS living labs, to see how the radar charts look before you run a session of your own. | |||
</div> | |||
== The survey == | |||
<br> | |||
<resimobform></resimobform> | <resimobform></resimobform> | ||
Revision as of 11:51, 21 September 2026
ResiMob is a survey and visualisation tool that shows a group of stakeholders their shared picture of who does what in a shared mobility system, and where that picture is not shared at all. It was developed in the DREAMS work on governance and business models and has been run with the partners of all six living labs.
A session takes a group of partners around a quarter of an hour. Each person rates how involved companies, authorities, users, non-users and civil society are today and how involved they ought to be, and the answers come back as one radar chart the group can read and argue over together.
What the tool asks
Public and private actors working on the same shared mobility service rarely describe it the same way. An operator, a municipal department, a user group and a neighbourhood organisation each see a different part of the system, and each holds a different view of who ought to be taking responsibility for which part of it. Those views usually stay implicit and only surface once a decision has to be made. ResiMob asks for them directly and puts them side by side.
Respondents work through nine components that together make up a resilient, inclusive and responsible shared mobility ecosystem. For each component they rate five actor types, namely private companies, governmental and municipal institutions, shared mobility users, citizens who do not use the services, and NGOs and third sector organisations. Involvement runs from one, very low, to five, very high, with zero available where the respondent cannot judge.
Two ratings for every actor
Each actor is rated twice on every component, and the value of the tool lies in the difference between the two.
How to read the results
Responses are pooled and drawn as a radar chart, and the results view can be filtered by city or region, by respondent type and by the actor being rated. Two readings matter.
The first is the distance between the current shape and the wished shape for a given actor. A wide gap marks a role the group thinks is underfilled today. A narrow gap marks an arrangement that is broadly accepted as it stands.
The second is the spread between respondent groups on the same component. Where operators, authorities and civil society draw the same shape, there is a working consensus to build on. Where they diverge, there is an assumption about responsibility that has not yet been tested in conversation.
ResiMob does not settle who should be responsible for what. It makes the disagreement visible and specific enough to be discussed, which is what a governance conversation needs before roles can be agreed. That is why it is most useful while actions and responsibilities are still a draft and each allocation can still change.
Taking the survey
A session can run in one room or be spread across the partners, and the results end up in the same combined chart either way.
View the pooled results → from the surveys run in all six DREAMS living labs, to see how the radar charts look before you run a session of your own.
The survey